In a criminal appeal, the High Court admitted the appeal and directed that the action under section 390 CrPC follow before the Sessions Court at Jalna after finding the trial court's findings warranted re-appreciation.
Action under section 390 of Code of Criminal Procedure to follow before the Sessions Court at Jalna.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.A-1281-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1281 OF 2014
The State of Maharashtra
...APPLICANT
versus
Subhash Dagdu Adhe
...RESPONDENT
Mr. A.M. Phule, APP for Applicant - State Mr. V.B. Garud, Advocate for Respondent – original accused
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 15th DECEMBER, 2016.
Order :-
2 Cri.A-1281-14
accompanied with deceased on the motorcycle. He further submits that evidence of prosecution witnesses suffers from material contradictions, improvements and omissions, therefore, the trial Court has rightly extended benefit of doubt to respondent – original accused. Hence, this court may not entertain this application.
before the Sessions Court at Jalna.
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S.S. SHINDE, J.]
MTK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the findings recorded by the trial court are in consonance with the evidence brought on record including medical evidence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Maharashtra
Subhash Dagdu Adhe
S.S. SHINDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
