High Court at Aurangabad allowed an application for extending the time limit to serve respondent No. 2 by three weeks and restored the underlying criminal application to its original file.
Application allowed; time for service of respondent No. 2 extended till 15-01-2017; underlying criminal application restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.A-6659-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6659 OF 2016 IN/WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6017 OF 2016
Sudhakar Trimbak Motipawale
...APPLICANT
versus
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. P.P. More , Advocate for Applicants Mr. A.A. Jagatkar, APP for Respondent State
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 16th DECEMBER, 2016.
Order :-
2 Cri.A-6659-16
serve respondent No. 2 stands extended till 15-01-2017.
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S.S. SHINDE, J.]
MTK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an extension of time for service of respondent No. 2 be granted.
Sudhakar Trimbak Motipawale
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
