In a writ petition regarding octoi, the court held that the petition does not survive due to the statutory abolition of octroi. The matter was disposed of by discharging the rule without costs.
Rule discharged; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-6952-02.doc
rpa
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6952 OF 2002
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. Suresh M. Sabrad, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2016.
P.C.
Called out for a final hearing. None
appears for the petitioners. The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent is present. By statutory amendment, octroi has been abolished. Therefore, with the passage of time, the petition does not survive and the same is disposed of. Rule is discharge. No order as to costs.
(C. V. BHADANG, J.)
(A.S. OKA, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
A.S. OKA
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
