Order in which the High Court examined a civil application in review. The court, hearing Learned AGP, found sufficient cause for the absence of a reply and made the rule absolute in terms of the prayer.
The rule was made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cao-192.14 in rpwst-2840.11.sxw
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.192 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.2840 OF 2011 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10413 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for the Applicants.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE : 24th FEBRUARY, 2016 P.C.
. Heard the learned AGP for the
Applicants. Notice has been served to the Respondent. There is no reply filed. Sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).
(C.V. BHADANG, J ) (A.S. OKA, J )
1 of 1
A.S. OKA
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
