The High Court restrained authorities from taking action for three weeks on notices issued under Section 50(3) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code to the applicants.
No action to be taken on notices under section 50(3) of Mh.L.R.C. 1966 for three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cai-41-16.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.41 OF 2016 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.122 OF 2010
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memorandam of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Mr. Sagar Anant Joshi, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Swapnil Mhatre i/b. Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and 7.
CORAM : A.S. OKA AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2016.
P.C.
Not on Board. Taken on Board.
2 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants and the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. The learned AGP represents the respondents in the writ petition. In view of the averments made in the application, we direct that for a period of three weeks from today, no action shall be taken on the basis of the notices issued to the applicants under Sub-section (3) of Section 50 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The application is disposed of.
(C. V. BHADANG, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicants
Respondents Nos. 1 to 5 and 7
A.S. OKA
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
