Petition challenging a detention order was found infructuous as the State Government had already revoked the order, leading to discharge of the rule.
Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16_wp_638_2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.638 OF 2016
Ramesh Gurunath Chavan …Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of Police, Solapur, & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Udaynath Tripathi for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent -State.
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 31st March, 2016.
P.C.:
This petition has been preferred against the order of detention issued against the Petitioner. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the detention order has been revoked by the State Government. In this view of the matter this petition is infructuous. Hence, rule is discharged.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Megha
1/1
Ramesh Gurunath Chavan
The Commissioner of Police, Solapur
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prab旅游度假区
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court