The High Court of Bombay (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) considered an application for suspension of sentence and bail pending appeal by an applicant convicted under Section 302 IPC. Finding prima facie material linking the applicant to the crime, the court dismissed the application refusing bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9_appa_229_2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.229 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.126 OF 2013
Tanaji Maruti Kolekar
...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
...
Mr. D.G. Khamkar for the Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedia, APP for the Respondent -State.
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ
DATED: 31st March, 2016.
ORAL ORDER [ PER SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J]:-
The Applicant, who has been convicted for offence under section 302 of the IPC has filed this application for suspension of sentence and releasing him on bail pending the appeal.
Megha
1/2
9_appa_229_2016
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Megha
2/2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for suspension of sentence and bail pending appeal should be allowed in a murder case where there is prima facie evidence of recovery and last seen link.
Whether the nature of the offence and prima facie material warrants suspension of sentence.
Whether to dismiss the criminal application for release on bail.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Tanaji Maruti Kolekar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court