Parvez Ahmed @ Guddu Vastav Abdul Wahid Khan v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 16.crwp.1264.16.(2).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1264 OF 2016
Parvez Ahmed @ Guddi Vastav Abdul Wahid Khan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. Yashpal Thakur Adv. appointed for Petitioner Mrs. A.S. Pai A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 30, 2016
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]:
2 The case of the petitioner is that he preferred an application for parole on 22.8.2013, however, the said application came to be rejected. Hence, the petitioner is now seeking that he be released on parole.
3 It is seen that the petitioner had relied on two medical certificates in support of his application for parole.
1 of 2
jdk 2 16.crwp.1264.16.(2).doc
These certificates are of the year 2013. Today, it is not possible to grant parole on the basis of medical certificates of the year 2013, hence, we are not inclined to grant parole to the petitioner, however, if today, any ground exists on which the petitioner can seek parole, it would be open to the petitioner to prefer a fresh application annexing relevant recent certificates. If such an application is preferred by the petitioner, the same to be decided expeditiously by the concerned authorities.
4 In view of the above, we are not inclined to grant prayer of the petitioner for parole, hence, rule is discharged.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
Parvez Ahmed
State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court