A writ petition concerning the petitioner's inability to join services since 2006. The Court held that petitioners remedies in law are available and disposed of the petition without interference.
Writ petition disposed without interference as alternative remedies were open to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5310 OF 2016
(Ramdas Sakharam Thorat Vs. The State of Maharashtra and
others)
Mr. Prashant S. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.G.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM :R.M. BORDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 22nd December, 2016
PER COURT:
Heard.
2.According to the petitioner, he is not
permitted to join the services since 2006 onwards and he
has made a complaint in that regard to the Regional
Deputy Director, Social Welfare, Latur.
3.It would be open for the petitioner to pursue
the complaint presented by him. No interference is
called for. Keeping the option of the petitioner open,
to avail of the remedies available in law, the Writ
Petition is disposed of.
npj/wp5310-2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in the petitioner's complaint regarding non-joining of services since 2006.
Ramdas Sakharam Thorat
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court