In this criminal writ petition challenging the denial of parole, the High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad held that the petitioner's reason fell outside the framework of applicable rules and dismissed the petition as devoid of substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
crwp60916.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.609 OF 2016
Suresh Asaram Nathbhajan (C-7291)
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent
Mr.S.J.Salgare, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA, JJ. DATE : 06th May, 2016
PER COURT:
The reason given by the petitioner-prisoner for seeking parole does not come within the purview of Rule 19 of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough And Parole) Rules, 1959. Request made by the prisoner is unreasonable and not liable to be considered within the framework of relevant Rules. Writ Petition is devoid of substance.
Criminal Writ Petition stands dismissed.
P.R.BORA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb/crwp60916
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suresh Asaram Nathbhajan
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.Borde
P.R.Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
