The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a criminal writ petition noting the petitioner had been granted parole, rendering the grievance met and nothing surviving for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
8 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 360 OF 2016
BHAGAJI KASHIRAM JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioner : Ms. Vidya S. Narale (appointed) Mr. MM Nerlikar, APP for Respondent/State.
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: May 05, 2016
PER COURT :-
BDV
BHAGAJI KASHIRAM JADHAV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
