In this criminal application challenging a charge sheet, the court kept open the option of taking exceptions to avail legal remedies and disposed of the writ petition informally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1532 OF 2016
SANDEEP ACHYUT GODSE AND AN VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AN
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J Mr. SY Mahajan, APP for Respondent/State.
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: May 05, 2016
PER COURT :-
Keeping open the option of taking exception to the charge sheet, to
avail of the remedies available in law,, the writ petition stands disposed of.
( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
BDV
SANDEEP ACHYUT GODSE AND AN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R.M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
