The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, dismissed the writ petition directing the petitioner to seek remedies under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 2016 instead of interference in disputed facts.
Petitioner directed to approach Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.10WP.5800.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 5800 OF 2016. (Digambar s/o Dadaji Gurpude .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S. Wahane, Advocate for petitioner,
Mr. A.M. Joshi, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : OCTOBER 4, 2016.
The petition involves disputed questions of fact which cannot be gone into in our extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
If the petitioner so desires, he may take recourse to appropriate remedy available to him under the provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
Judge
Judge
J.
4.10WP.5800.16
2
C E R T I F I C A T E
“I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order”.
Uploaded by : Ki. Jeswani, Uploaded on : 5.10.2016.
Digambar s/o Dadaji Gurpude
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
