The Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 3859/1998 as infructuous due to subsequent developments, discharging the rule.
Writ Petition disposed as rendered infructuous; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03.10.wp.3859.98
1
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3859/1998
(1. Rajendra s/o Wasudeorao Ingale and another vs. The Collector, Amravati and two others )
.............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. H. Chitaley, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Kalyani Deshpande, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos .1 and 2
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ DATED : 3rd October, 2016
Heard.
In view of the subsequent development, nothing survives for adjudication in the Petition.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as rendered infructuous. Rule discharged.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
03.10.wp.3859.98
2
C E R T I F I C A T E
“ I certify that this Judgment/Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order.”
Uploaded by: N.B.Sahare P.S.
Uploaded on: 04.10.2016.
Rajendra s/o Wasudeorao Ingale and another
The Collector, Amravati and two others
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court