The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 11087 of 2016 concerning electoral rolls while keeping open the liberty for petitioners to raise objections after the provisional rolls are finalized.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11087 OF 2016
(Balasaheb Vyankatrao Gaikwad and others Vs. The State
of Maharashtra and others)
Mr. Amol B. Chalak,Advocate holding for Mr. Avinash S.
Khedkar, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. K.D. Munde, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3
Mr. T.G. Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent No. 4
CORAM :R.M. BORDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 22nd December, 2016
PER COURT:
Heard.
2.It would be open for the petitioners to raise
appropriate objections to the electoral rolls as and
when the respondent/authorities prepare the programme
for finalization of electoral rolls.
3.Keeping open the liberty of the petitioners of
raising objections to the provisional electoral rolls
after the declaration of the programme for finalization
of the electoral rolls by the Election Authority, the
Writ Petition stands disposed of.
npj/wp11087-2016
Balasaheb Vyankatrao Gaikwad and others
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court