On a withdrawal petition of a writ petition filed before this court, the petition for judicial review was unconditionally withdrawn and consequently dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 14-wp4836-.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4836 OF 2016
SHREE SANT DNYANESHWAR SHIKSHAN MANDAL THROUGH
VICE PRESIDENT MAHENDRA SONU PRABH
VERSUS
PRASHANT NAGO BADGUJAR AND OTHERS
Mr.Sunil Dighe, Advocate i/b. Mr.M.M.Bhokarikar,
Advocate for petitioners
Mr.C.V.Dharurkar, AGP for respondent nos.2 to 4
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : MAY 06, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2]The learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to
withdraw the Writ Petition, unconditionally.
3]The Writ Petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn, unconditionally.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
SHREE SANT DNYANESHWAR SHIKSHAN MANDAL THROUGH VICE PRESIDENT MAHENDRA SONU PRABH
PRASHANT NAGO BADGUJAR AND OTHERS
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court