Disposed

Jijau Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Bokangaon Dist Latur through Its President and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC5 May 2016WP/1128/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court directed the educational institution respondent to expeditiously decide pending proposals regarding running schools with 5th to 7th standards by June 15, 2016. Petitions were disposed.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No.1 to decide on all five pending proposals regarding expansion of standards by 15th June 2016.

Jijau Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Bokangaon… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1125.16wp+

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

¶6

______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO.1125 OF 2016 WITH WP/1126/2016 WITH WP/1127/2016 WITH WP/1128/2016 WITH WP/1131/2016

¶7

ANAND PRATISHTHAN LATUR DIST LATUR THROUGH
ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶9

...

¶10

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Ghute Patil
Kishor J. & Mr.M P Tripathi
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.B.
Yawalkar.

¶11

Advocate for Respondent 5: Mr.D.S. Mali.

¶12

...

¶13

CORAM:S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
 Dated: MAY 05, 2016

¶14

Heard learned Counsel for the
petitioners and learned AGP appearing for
the State and learned Counsel for
respondent No.5.

¶15

2The learned Counsel for the
petitioners submits that the proposals
withfavourable recommendations by
respondent No.2 for running 5th to 7th

¶16

1125.16wp+

¶17

¶18

standards as per natural growth, are
pending with respondent No.1. However,
respondent No.1 has not taken decision on
the said proposals.

¶19

3In the light of the submissions of
the learned Counsel for the petitioners,
we direct respondent No.1 to take
decision, if already not taken, on all the
five proposals, which are subject matter
of the aforementioned five writ petitions,
as expeditiously as possible; however, on
or before 15th June, 2016.

¶20

4With the above observations, all the
writ petitions stand disposed of.

¶21

Parties to act upon authenticated
copy of this order.

¶22

(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)

¶23

kadam/

Jijau Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Bokangaon Dist Latur through Its President and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jijau Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Bokangaon Dist Latur through Its President and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parbhani Education Society Parbhani through Its President Mohammad Abdul Rasheed Engineer Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Narayan Dhanaji Rathod Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shodhan Yashwant Joshi Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Anand Pratishthan Latur Dist Latur through Its Secretary and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Al Raheman Education and Welfare Foundation Latur through Its Secretary and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bhartiya Dnyanvardhani Lokvidas Sanstha Helamb Dist Latur through Its Secretary and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others