The Writ Petition was disposed of as withdrawn based on the counsel's prayer for liberty to withdraw. The Rule was discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1511wp4631.99.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.4631 of 1999
(Purshottam Suvalal Poddar and Ors. vs. The Municipal Council, Yavatmal and Ors.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr.D.M.Kale, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms T.H.Udeshi, AGP for respondent/State.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND V.M.DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 15.11.2016.
Mr.A.A.Naik, learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw present Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as 'withdrawn'.
Rule is discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
jaiswal
Purshottam Suvalal Poddar and Ors.
The Municipal Council, Yavatmal and Ors.
B.R.GAVAI
V.M.DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
