The High Court refused to entertain a Pursis regarding a withdrawn Central Excise Reference. Upon learning of the Government's decision to withdraw the reference, the Court dismissed the filing.
Reference disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Pursis St. No. 2996 of 2016 IN
Ccentral Excise Reference No. 1 of 1999 [Principal Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax Vs. Customs Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal & another]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.N. Bhattad, Adv., for the Appellant. Mr. Gaikwad, Adv., for respondent no.2.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 15th November, 2016
A Pursis has been filed on behalf of the appellant.
In view of the litigation policy framed by the Govt. of India, the Department has decided to withdraw the present Central Excise Reference.
Reference is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn.
Judge Judge
|hedau|
Central Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax
Customs Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal
B. R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
