Allowed

Arun S/O. Harichandra Narnaware and Another v. State of Maha., through President, District Selection Committee/Dist. Collector, Nagpur and Others

Bombay HC15 Nov 2016CAW/2399/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur allowed the application, directed notice issue returnable within four weeks, and permitted substituted service via 'Chaspa' to specific respondents.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; notice returnable within four weeks; substituted service via Chaspa to Respondents 4 & 5 allowed.

Arun S/O. Harichandra Narnaware and Another v. State of Maha., through President, District Selection Committee/Dist. Collector, Nagpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Arun S/O. Harichandra Narnaware and Another v. State of Maha., through President, District Selection Committee/Dist. Collector, Nagpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Mukesh Hariram Waghmare and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Medical Education and Drugs, Mumbai and Anoth

The Azad Macchipalan Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit Thr. President Sandip S/O Wasudeo Meshram Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Principal Secretary Dept. of Agriculture Animal Husbandary Dairy Mumbai and

The Itiadoh Jalashay Matsyavsay Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, Arjuni Mor.Thr. President Rajhans K. Dhok Vs State of Maha. Thr. Pri. Secty. Deptt. Agrl. Animal Husbandry Dairy Devp. and Fisheries and 2 Other

Dr. Sucheta Bhowate W/O Shrikant Meshram and Another Vs Dean and Chairman P.G. Selection Committee and Others

Purushottam Suvalal Poddar and 5 Others Vs the Municipal Council Yavatmal and 2 Others

The Commissioner, Central Excise, Nagpur. Vs the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) N.Delhi and Anr.