Allowed
Chetan Dnyaneshwar Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/4611/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad directed the respondent authority to decide the plea for the petitioner's appointment as expeditiously as possible, with a hard deadline of eight weeks to communicate the decision.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No. 4 to decide the proposal for appointment and communicate the decision to respondent No. 5 within eight weeks.