This court disposed of a civil application impleading a party in a writ petition. It directed impleadment of the applicant as a respondent and granted continued interim relief until June 27, 2016.
Civil application allowed and disposed; applicant impleaded as respondent; interim relief continued till June 27, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1217 OF 2016
IN/WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 12270 OF 2015
GOVIND PUNDLIK MARDE
VERSUS
SANJAYKUMAR SAMRTHRAO KAUDGAVE
AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.S. Shelke
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.H. Dighe
Advocate for Respondent no.1 : Mr. P.M. Shinde
...
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
Dated: June 09, 2016
...
PER COURT :-
Heard.
2.Without prejudice to the contentions of
the Respondents, the Civil Application is allowed
and same stands disposed of.
3.The petitioner to implead the applicant as
party respondent. Notice to added respondent.
Mr.A.S. Shelke waives service of notice on behalf
of added respondent and prays time for filing
reply. Stand over to 27th June, 2016. Interim
relief granted earlier to continue till then.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) ( S.S. SHINDE, J.)
...
sga/-
Govind Pundlik Marde
Sanjaykumar Samthrao Kaudgave
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court