Vinayak Uttamrao Banchod v. Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Mumbai
Bombay HCWP/2534/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court transferred a writ petition to the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal as the Division Bench was unavailable, directing conversion of the petition into an original application.
What did the court decide?
petition transferred to Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal for conversion into an original application and petitioner directed to appear on 27th July, 2016
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
wp2534-2015
¶2
1
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶4
WRIT PETITION NO. 2534 OF 2015
(Vinayak Uttamrao Banchod Vs. Maharashtra Public Service
Commission, Mumbai)
¶5
Mr. Santosh S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondents No. 2 and 3
None for respondent No. 1
¶6
----
¶7
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
¶8
DATE : 10th JUNE, 2016
¶9
PER COURT:
¶10
1. Heard.
¶11
2.Learned A.G.P., appearing for respondents No. 2
¶12
and 3, submits that the petitioner ought to have filed
originalapplicationbeforetheMaharashtra
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Vinayak Uttamrao Banchod
- respondent
Maharashtra Public Service Commission
Coram
AI extract
S.S. SHINDE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Govind Pundlik Marde Vs Sanjaykumar Samrthrao Kaudgave and Others
Jigisha Arun Marwale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others
Nevjeevan Sevabhavi Sanstha through Its Secretary Sheikh Shabbir Janimiya and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others
Baburao Genba Randive Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others