This is a one-line order where the High Court, informed that the C summary report is filed, stated the petitioner could file appropriate proceedings if aggrieved and dismissed the criminal writ petition.
Petitioner directed to file appropriate proceedings if aggrieved; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 436 OF 2015
(Jaidev s/o Mahiram Godse Vs. The State of Maharashtra
and another)
Mr. G.R. Syed, Advocate holding for Mr. P.R.
Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. D.R. Kale, A.P.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 10th October, 2016
PER COURT:
The learned A.P.P., representing the State,
informs this Court that the “C” summary report is
already filed. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he
is at liberty to file the appropriate proceedings.
Consequently, the criminal writ petition stands
dismissed.
[ SANGITRAO S. PATIL ] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE
npj/criwp436-2015
Jaidev s/o Mahiram Godse
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court