The High Court dismissed a criminal writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner on instructions. No substantive decision on the merits was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 373 OF 2016 (Govind s/o Lakhuji Jadhav Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another)
Mr. N.B. Jadhav, Advocate holding for Mr. G.P. Shinde,
Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. D.R. Kale, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
Smt. R.D. Reddy, Advocate for respondent No. 2
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 10th October, 2016
PER COURT:
The learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw
the petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
[ SANGITRAO S. PATIL ] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE
npj/criwp373-2016
Govind s/o Lakhuji Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
another
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court