Ajinkyaraj Tractors, Vaijapur v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The court accordingly dismisses the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 278 OF 2013
(Ajinkyaraj Tractors, through Manager Yadnyeshwar s/o
Babasaheb Darekar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and
others)
Mr. A.N. Kakade, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. K.S. Patil, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 10th October, 2016
PER COURT:
The learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL][S.S. SHINDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
npj/criwp278-2013
Ajinkyaraj Tractors, through Manager Yadnyeshwar s/o Babasaheb Darekar
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court