Disposed

Preeti Devidas Garde v. Education Officer Zp Aurangabad and Others

Bombay HC18 Oct 2016WP/4217/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay issued directions to the Scrutiny Committee to verify the petitioner's Scheduled Tribe caste certificate within eight months. The appointment authority was directed to forward the proposal for approval within eight weeks and grant provisional approval pending verification.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to Scrutiny Committee to verify caste certificate within eight months; Institution directed to forward proposal for approval within eight weeks.

Preeti Devidas Garde Vs Education Officer Zp… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 WP-4217-16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 4217 OF 2016

¶4

Preeti Devidas Garde ...PETITIONER

¶5

versus

¶6

Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad and others ...RESPONDENTS

¶7

Mr. S.S. Phatale Advocate for petitioner Mr. P.S. Patil, AGP for respondents No. 1 and 3 Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate for respondent No. 2

¶8

CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

¶9

DATED : 18^th OCTOBER, 2016.

¶10

Order :-

¶11

Petitioner claims to be belonging to ' Koli Mahadeo ' schedule tribes. The petitioner has been appointed as ' Shikshan Sevak ' as against seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe Category in respondent No. 2 Institution. The case certificate issued in favour of the petitioner is referred for verification to respondent No. 3 - Scrutiny Committee and said proposal is stated to be pending. As a result of failure of the petitioner to submit the caste validity certificate, respondent No. 2 Institution has not referred the proposal to respondent No. 1 - Education Officer for according approval to the appointment of petitioner. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate the Scrutiny Committee in rendering decision within prescribed time frame.

¶12

2 WP-4217-16

¶13

In the circumstances, this petition can be disposed of by issuing directions to respondent No. 3-Scrutiny Committee to take decision on the caste certificate verification proposal in respect of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight months from today and it is accordingly directed.

¶14

Respondent No. 2 - Institution shall forward proposal for approval of the petitioner's appointment, if same has not been forwarded to respondent No. 1, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of eight weeks from today. On receipt of proposal, respondent No. 1 - Education Officer shall consider the same on its own merits, in accordance with law and if the petitioner is found eligible, shall grant provisional approval to the appointment of petitioner subject to result of the caste certificate verification claim pending with respondent No. 3- Scrutiny Committee.

¶15

With observations as above, writ petition stands disposed of.

¶16

Sd/Sd/-

¶17

[K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]

Preeti Devidas Garde v. Education Officer Zp Aurangabad and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Preeti Devidas Garde v. Education Officer Zp Aurangabad and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sayyed Hifakatali Dastgir Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Paevesh Isak Pathan Shelke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Chhaya Motichand Bundelkhandi Vs Rajan Kop the Director of Town Planning Maharashtra State Pune and Others

Imran Usman Shaikh and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pushpa Anil Khairnar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Iqra Educational Society through Its President Abdul Kareem Abdul Majid Salar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another