Single-line order disposing of a contempt petition after finding that the earlier court order dated 26.8.2014 was complied with, redressing the grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
38 CONT. PETITION NO. 191 OF 2016
IN WP/3710/2014
CHHAYA MOTICHAND BUNDELKHANDI VERSUS
RAJAN KOP THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING MAHARASHTRA STATE PUNE AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. G.L. Gujar AGP for Respondents:Mr. K.N. Lokhande
Advocate for Respondent No.4 :Mr. P.S. Dighe h/f Mr. V.R.Dhorde
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. Date: October 17, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 On perusal of the affidavit in reply tendered on behalf of the respondents, it reveals that the order issued by this Court on 26.8.2014 has been complied with.
2 In view of this, the grievance raised in the Contempt Petition has been redressed.
3 Contempt petition is disposed of.
( K. K. SONAWANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
Chhaya Motichand Bundelkhandi
Rajan Kop
R. M. Borde
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
