This is a one-paragraph order disposing of a contempt petition in which the Court held that a previous order complying with a directive to register offences against erring individuals had been complied with.
Contempt petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
35 CONT. PETITION NO. 60 OF 2015
IN WP/10252/2012
SAYYED HIFAKATALI DASTGIR
VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A.V. Patil Indrale GP for Respondents:Mr. A.B. Girase
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. Date: October 17, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 Learned Government Pleader appearing for the State informs that the order issued by this Court has been complied with and an offence has been registered against the erring individuals. Copy of the communication issued by the Deputy Director of Education, Latur division, Latur is placed on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
2 In view of above, the grievance raised in the contempt petition stands substantially redressed.
( K. K. SONAWANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
SAYYED HIFAKATALI DASTGIR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
K. K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
