Lucky Rajendrakumar Agrawal and Others v. State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary, Forest and Revenue Dept., Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.9WP.398.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 398 OF 2016. (Lucky Rajendrakumar Agrawal & others .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. Sunil V. Manohar, Senior Counsel with Mr. V.B. Bhishe, Advocate for petitioners, Mr. M.K. Pathan, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 19, 2016.
The petitioners have approached this Court being aggrieved by the proclamation dated 27.5.2015 vide which they had banned excavation of minor minerals within the area of ten kilometers from the boundaries of Narnala wildlife sanctuary.
In the reply filed on behalf of the respondents, it is stated in paragraph nos. 5, 6 & 7 thus :-
“5. It is most respectfully submitted that, during the pendency of the challenges made by the petitioners, the answering respondent Sub Divisional Officer, Akot issued a Short Term Permit to the present petitioner no. 1 & 2. The copy of order issued to respondent no. 1 is annexed herewith as Annexure R-1 . The perusal of the said communication would show that, the Short Term Permit is given for a period from 18.5.2016 to 30.5.2016. The answering respondent is also
19.9WP.398.16
2
annexing herewith a copy of Short Term Permit issued to the petitioner no. 2 from 30.4.2016 to 19.5.2016. The copy of said Short Term Permit is annexed herewith as Annexure R-2.
In that view of the matter, we find that the grievance of the petitioners no more survives. The petition is disposed of having served its purpose.
Judge
Judge
J.
19.9WP.398.16
3
C E R T I F I C A T E
“I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order”.
Uploaded by : Ki. Jeswani, Uploaded on : 20.9.2016.
Lucky Rajendrakumar Agrawal & others
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court