The petitioner withdrew the writ petition due to subsequent developments. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.09.2p.1978.14
1
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.1978/2014
(Dr.Dnyaneshwar Shriram Kanki vs. Dr.panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth and others )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr.S.U. Nemade, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.P.B. Patil, Advocate for Respondent no.2
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI &
V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ
DATED : 19th September, 2016
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent development, the petitioner does not want to prosecute the instant petition. The Writ Petition is therefore disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
19.09.2p.1978.14
2
C E R T I F I C A T E
“ I certify that this Judgment/Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order.”
Uploaded by: N.B.Sahare P.S.
Uploaded on: 19.09.2016.
Dr.Dnyaneshwar Shriram Kanki
Dr.panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth
B.R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court