Manojkumar S/O. Bharatsingh Baghel Vs Mr. Shantanu Goyal Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli

¶1

1

¶2

CP283-16.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

Contempt Petition No.283/2016 in

¶5

Writ Petition No.217/2016 (D) (Manojkumar Bharatsingh Baghel .vs. Mr. Shantanu Goyal, C.E.O., Z.P. Gadchiroli)

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders

¶7

Mr. Nitin Jachak, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. H.A. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent.

¶8

CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : September 16, 2016.

¶9

Mr. H.A. Deshpande, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that as per the order of this Court in Writ Petition No. 217/2016, the petitioner has already been reinstated.

¶10

However, an apprehension is expressed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that after the reinstatement, the petitioner has been directed to submit his caste certificate of backward class to which he claims to belong. It is submitted that the petitioner does not belong to any backward class category.

¶11

We find that the apprehension as expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is misplaced. The order of this Court is very much clear, which clarifies that the petitioner would not claim any of the benefits meant for the Scheduled Tribe. As such the petitioner would have been treated as a candidate belonging to open category and the respondent in that

¶12

2

¶13

CP283-16.odt

¶14

situation cannot insist upon submission of the caste certificate or validity certificate.

¶15

Since the contempt has been purged, no orders are necessary. Contempt petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE

JUDGE

halwai

3

CP283-16.odt

Certificate

I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.

¶23

Uploaded by : R.G. Halwai.

¶24

Uploaded on: 20.9.2016

Manojkumar S/O. Bharatsingh Baghel v. Mr. Shantanu Goyal Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manojkumar S/O. Bharatsingh Baghel v. Mr. Shantanu Goyal Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sau. Priti W/O Vivek Mendhe (Nee Priti Rameshrao Udole) and Others Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai and Another

Jan Manch, Nagpur, through Its Advisor Shri. S.W. Patil Vs State of Maha., Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Mumbai and Others

Kishorilal S/O Sukhram Rahangdale Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Home Department, Mumbai and Others

Mithun S/O. Chhayaram Gonnade Vs Mr. Shantanu Goyal Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli

Yogeshkumar S/O Shalikram Farkunde and Another Vs Maha. State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Deori, Gondia Thr. Executive Engineer, and Other

M/S R. J. Fouzdar Bus Service, Hoshangabad through Its Partner, Shri Rakesh Fouzdar Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Ot Home Deptt. (Transport), Mumbai and Others