Writ petitions were disposed of after the respondents established that the Municipal Council would address pending proceedings, resolving the petitioners grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
12 WRIT PETITION NO. 3965 OF 2016
WITH WP/3966/2016 WITH WP/3967/2016
NARENDRA KUMAR KACHARULALJI ABAD AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Vakil Afzal Husain M.
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. A. R. Kale
Advocate for Respondent Municipal Council :Mr. Amit
Deshpande
CORAM: R. M. BORDE &
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE:
9th August, 2016
ORDER:
1.Heard learned counsel for the respective
parties.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the
respondent- Municipal Council, Jalna states on
instructions that the proceedings pending with the
Municipal Council will be dealt with and appropriate
orders will be passed within a period of four weeks
from today. Learned AGP appearing for the State
informs on instructions that after receipt of the
proposal/ decision of the Municipal Council,
appropriate steps would be taken within a period of
four weeks thereafter.
1/2
12.odt
3. In view of the statements made, the grievance
raised by the petitioners in the instant petitions
stands redressed. Writ petitions are accordingly
disposed of.
(K. L. WADANE, J.) (R. M. BORDE, J. )JPC
2/2
Narendra Kumar Kacharulalji Abad and Others
The State of Maharashtra
Others
R. M. BORDE
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court