A writ petition was disposed of without any substantive reasoning, as the respondent Advocate stated that the decision would be declared within one week, causing the grievance to no longer survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
23 WRIT PETITION NO.2073 OF 2016
SHASHIKUMAR S/O SHIVANAND DALGADE VERSUS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. A.A. Mukhedkar AGP for Respondents: Mr. P.S. Patil
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: August 08, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 Learned AGP appearing for the respondents, on instructions, states that the decision in the matter would be declared within a period of one week from today.
2 In view of the statement made, the grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant petition does not survive.
( K.L. WADANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
SHASHIKUMAR S/O SHIVANAND DALGADE
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
