The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition rendered infructuous due to the lapse of a subsequent notification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
51 WRIT PETITION NO. 4634 OF 2016
SANKET FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR VINAY NAVINCHANDRA SHAH AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE COMMISSIONER OF FOOD SAFETY FOOD AND DRUGS ADMINISTRATION MUMBAI
... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. A. N. Sikchi AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.S. Dande
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: August 08, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 The petition has rendered infructuous in view of subsequent developments in the nature of lapsing of Notification w.e.f. 20.7.2016.
2 In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
vbd
Sanket Food Products Pvt Ltd
Vinay Navinchandra Shah
The Commissioner of Food Safety Food and Drugs Administration Mumbai
R. M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
