Petitioner sought extension of parole on grounds of illness but had absconded after the initial grant expired. Court found rules allow 90 days max (2 extensions). absconding led to dismissal of petition.
Petitioner's prayer for extension of parole rejected and rule discharged due to absconding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.3659.2015_901.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3659 OF 2015
Abdulla Ahmed Aanarkadi Mutlib ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents
Ms.Pooja R. Singh i/b Mrs.Pratibha A. Borade for the Petitioner Mrs.U.V. Kejriwal, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JULY 1, 2016
P.C.:
1 / 2
wp.3659.2015_901.doc
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for extension of parole should be entertained given that the petitioner has absconded after the parole period expired.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abdulla Ahmed Aanarkadi Mutlib
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
