The applicant, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and appealing, sought appointment of counsel. The court declined as counsel had already been appointed for his related bail application, rendering this application moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
appa.687.2016_902(1).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.687 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.433 OF 2016
Tukaram Rau Jadhav ... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
None for the Applicant Mrs.A.S. Pai, APP, for Respondent State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JULY 1, 2016
P.C.:
1 / 2
appa.687.2016_902(1).doc
application for bail being Criminal Application No.686 of 2016 and hence, this application now does not survive and we dispose of the same as such.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 / 2
Tukaram Rau Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
