Petitioner claimed relief in a writ petition. Court held grievance redressed as vehicle released, declaring petition infructuous and disposing of it.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
WP 3597/16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3597/2016
Vilas Deorao Hiwale.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri M.B. Bharaswadkar, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 29.06.2016
ORDER :
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that
the grievance of the petitioner has already been
redressed since the vehicle has been released. As such
the petition is rendered infructuous and stands disposed
of accordingly.
(K.L. WADANE, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)
ndk/ c2961614.doc
Vilas Deorao Hiwale
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court