Disposed
Shaikh Rashid Mahinuddin and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/2629/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
WP 2629/16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2629/2016
Shaikh Rashid Mahinuddin & another.
...Petitioners..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri S.V. Jadhav, Advocate for petitioners.
Shri V.M. Kagne, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 29.06.2016
ORDER :
1]The petitioners are praying for issuing directions
to the respondents to determine the market value of the
acquired property in accordance with the Act of 2013 and
pay compensation accordingly.
2]An affidavit in reply has been presented on behalf
of the respondent no.3 wherein it has been stated that
the authorities would be taking steps for passing award
as per the Act of 2013. It has been stated that award
has not been passed within a period of three years from
WP 2629/16
the date of issuance of notification u/s 4 and as such
the land acquisition proceedings stood lapsed. The
respondent - authorities have undertaken to take steps
for initiating fresh proceedings in accordance with the
Act of 2013.
3]The petitioners have stated in the petition that the
physical possession of the property has not yet been
taken.
4]It would be open for the authorities to take steps
in accordance with the provisions of law.
5]In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of.
No costs.
(K.L. WADANE, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.)
ndk/ c296168.doc
Shaikh Rashid Mahinuddin & another.
The State of Maharashtra & others.
R.M. BORDE
K.L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court