The High Court directed the State Information Commissioner to decide the petitioner's application regarding authorities' failure to submit requested information within four weeks. The Commissioner's earlier order was set aside.
Order of State Information Commissioner set aside; directed to pass appropriate order within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2513.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2513 OF 2016
Prakash s/o Ganpati Sonar .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.T. Veer, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for the State. Mr. M.C. Swami, advocate for respondent no. 2.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K. L. WADANE, JJ. DATE : 28th JUNE, 2016.
PER COURT :
wp2513.16.doc
2
Information Commission shall pass appropriate order in accordance with the provisions of law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from today.
( K. L. WADANE ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State Information Commissioner is empowered to take decision on the petitioner's application against authorities for persistent failure to submit information.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prakash s/o Ganpati Sonar
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
