Dismissed
Tanaji Panaji Langade v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/274/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 274 OF 2014
Tanaji Panaji Langade .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
.. Respondent
Appearances
Mr. Prosper D'Souza Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : JUNE 16, 2016.
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC by learned
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
Sessions Judge, Nasik in Sessions Case No. 172 of 2007. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred Criminal Appeal No. 645 of 2008 before this Court.
of Superintendent of Nasik Road Central Prison where the petitioner was lodged. The said report is taken on record
and marked 'X' for identification. The report shows that the petitioner has been acquitted in Criminal Appeal No. 645 of 2008, hence, he has been released from prison. In this view of the matter, this petition has become infructuous, hence, rule is discharged.
Rs. 2000/-.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
Tanaji Panaji Langade
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court