This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6b. cri appw 292-14.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 292 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4277 OF 2013
Subhash Parshuram Barge .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
Mr. Sachin Chandan Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant Mrs. A.S. Pai APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 16, 2016.
P.C.:
As the Writ Petition is disposed of, this application has
become infructuous and is disposed of as such.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 1
Subhash Parshuram Barge
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
