In this criminal writ petition, the applicant sought 21 days of furlough. The court noted the applicant had been releasing yearly since 2013 and was currently on parole, finding no case for interference.
Rule discharged. Prayer for furlough dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.1477.2015_13(2).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1477 OF 2015
Emile Jerome ... Applicant
Vs.
The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons & Ors. ... Respondents
Ms.Rohini Dandekar for the Applicant Mrs.A.S. Pai, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JUNE 15, 2016
ORAL ORDER (PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.):
1 / 2
wp.1477.2015_13(2).doc
and the petitioner was released on furlough from 14.11.2013 to 18.12.2013. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an application for furlough on 28.12.2013 which pertained to release on furlough in the year 2014. The said application was granted and the petitioner was released on furlough on 30.5.2014 till 19.6.2014. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an application for furlough on 24.11.2014. The said application was granted and the petitioner was released on furlough from 18.6.2015 to 22.7.2015. In addition, the petitioner was released on parole from 9.1.2013 to 9.3.2013 and from 24.6.2014 to 21.9.2014. Thus, it is seen that from the year 2013, every year, the petitioner has been released on furlough. Moreover, it is seen that at present the petitioner is on parole.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to furlough.
Emile Jerome
The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
