furnishes a suitable and competent surety and during the period that the petitioner is on furlough, he will not enter into Thane city. In addition, condition was imposed that the surety as well as the petitioner would give surety bond. In view of the fact that when the petitioner was earlier released on parole, he did not report back in time, it was directed that the petitioner should furnish some other surety than the surety furnished earlier. This was on account of the fact that it was felt that the said surety would not be able to keep a check on the petitioner which was evident from the fact that on the earlier occasion the petitioner did not report to the prison in time. However, though the appeal was allowed, the petitioner again wrote back to the authorities that he be released on furlough on furnishing the same surety which he had furnished earlier as he had no other surety. Thus the prayer of the petitioner is that he be released on furlough without furnishing surety or on furnishing the same surety.
