This is an oral order in a writ petition filed for parole. The respondent produced a report from the Superintendent of Kolhapur Central Prison showing that the petitioner had completed imprisonment and was released, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 1.crwp.1984.14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1984 OF 2014
Ehsan Mohammed Tufil Mohammed Qureshi
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. Abhaykumar Apte Advocate appointed for Petitioner Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 14, 2016
ORAL ORDER : [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]:
1 Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith.
2 The prayer of the petitioner in this petition is for parole. The learned A.P.P. has produced the report dated 12.6.2016 of the Superintendent of Kolhapur Central Prison Kadamba, where the petitioner was lodged. The said report is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The said
1 of 2
jdk 2 1.crwp.1984.14.doc
report shows that the petitioner has completed his period of imprisonment and has been released from prison. In this view of the matter, this petition is infructous, hence, Rule is discharged.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
Ehsan Mohammed Tufil Mohammed Qureshi
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
