The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the applicant's prayer for bail in a murder case due to strong eye-witness evidence. The court also rejected the request for early hearing of the pending appeal.
Prayer for bail and for early hearing of appeal rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.APPA570_2016.doc
Vidya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.570 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 185 OF 2015
Irappa @ Chermal Subhash Dhangar Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
... Applicant
... Respondent
Ms. Rohini M. Dandekar, Advocate appointed for the applicant. Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM: MRS.V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JUNE 13, 2016
P.C.:
Heard both sides.
1 / 2
10.APPA570_2016.doc
It is seen that the Appeal is of the year 2015. At present, hearing of appeals of the year 2009 are going on. Hence, it is not possible to expedite the hearing of the Appeal .
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 / 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant convicted under section 302 IPC.
Whether the hearing of the pending appeal should be expedited.
Irappa @ Chermal Subhash Dhangar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
