The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw his criminal writ petition without any conditions and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp26616.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.266 OF 2016
Nidansing Jalamsing Shiklikar
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr.A.S.Savale, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.K.S.Patil, APP for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.R.Andhale, advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.L.WADANE, JJ. DATE : 11th April, 2016
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Leave granted.
Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
K.L.WADANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb/crwp26616
Nidansing Jalamsing Shiklikar
State of Maharashtra
another
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
