The court disposed of the criminal writ petition by keeping the petitioner's right to file a complaint under the Code of Criminal Procedure open, thereby shielding him from alternative remedies available in law.
Petition dismissed; option to file complaint under CrPC kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp18916.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.189 OF 2016
Ashok Pandharinath Ghuge
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.A.K.Shejwal, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.M.Nerlikar, APP for Respondents No.1 & 2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.L.WADANE, JJ. DATE : 11th April, 2016
PER COURT:
It would be open for the petitioner, if so chooses, to present a Complaint in accordance with the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure to the learned Magistrate.
Keeping an option open to the petitioner to avail of alternate remedies available in law, writ petition stands disposed of.
K.L.WADANE JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/crwp18916
Ashok Pandharinath Ghuge
State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
