The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Bench at Aurangabad) rejected the applicant’s successive bail application in a criminal appeal on the grounds that no new grounds were presented, directing disposal after two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criappln1667.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1667 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 364 OF 2015
Irfan @ Afroz s/o Sannaulla Farooque
.. APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
.. RESPONDENT
Mr. P.S. Paranjape, advocate for applicant. Mr. S.J. Salgare, APP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K. L. WADANE, JJ. DATE : 7th APRIL, 2016.
PER COURT :
( K. L. WADANE ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Irfan @ Afroz
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
