Mr. Jayesh Manubhai Shah v. Mr. Subhash Inderjit Anand and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-OSWP2523-14.DOC
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2523 OF 2014
Jayesh Manubhai Shah…Petitioner
Versus
Subhash Inderjit Anand & 2 Ors.…Respondents
Mr. J.A. Udaipuri, Advocate for the Petitioner, absent.
Ms. V.S. Avasare, First Assistant to Official Assignee, present.
CORAM:S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
G.S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED:20th January 2016
PC:-
1.On the earlier occasion, we had enquired from the
Petitioner's Advocate as to how a Writ Petition would lie against an
order passed in Insolvency proceedings. The Petitioner's Advocate
then sought time to take instructions. We accommodated Mr.
Udaipuri, learned Advocate for the Petitioner since it was stated
that he was in difficulty. However, a colleague Advocate who
appeared with Mr. Udaipuri was specifically directed to take
instructions from the Petitioner and satisfy the Court about the
maintainability of the Writ Petition.
1 of 2
904-OSWP2523-14.DOC
2. Though the Petition was posted today, none is appearing for the Petitioner. We find that it is really a grievance in relation to the Insolvency proceedings and which has been projected.
3. In these circumstances, by granting liberty to the Petitioner to adopt appropriate remedy, we dispose of this Writ Petition.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
2 of 2
Jayesh Manubhai Shah
Subhash Inderjit Anand & 2 Ors
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court